Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.61 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
