Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
67.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1/4.1:1
Maximum drag8kg / 17.64lbs
Weight525g / 18.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 20/200

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.61 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
