Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
87.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
71.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX edges out Daiwa TD Match 3012X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD Match 3012X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa TD Match?
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD Match 3012X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
