Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
87.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.12

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
