Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX and Daiwa Tanacom 750 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa Tanacom 750 stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
