Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
