Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X

Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 SFI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8.82 lbs) and ball bearings (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73cm / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
