Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic SWB
Seafishing
63.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €183.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.61 out of 10) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.0:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic SWB and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX
- At 5.41 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
