Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
