Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
69.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm) and maximum drag (20kg / 44,09lbs). While Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104cm / 56cm), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
