Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm) and maximum drag (20kg / 44,09lbs). While Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica 20II CAM and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104cm / 56cm), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
