Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
86.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16IIA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 30/275

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 16IIAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Talica II and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
