Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
