Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 130AX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 130AX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
