Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX clearly outshines Shimano FX 1000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). While Shimano FX 1000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 130AX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Shimano FX?
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX
