Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
82.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight2365g / 83.42oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50AX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50AX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a weight of 205g / 7,23oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 50AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
