Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight2445g / 86.25oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WLRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
- Scoring 8.87 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
