Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight1000g / 35.27oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3 S-ARB + 1RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €184.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30HGAL
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
