Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
83.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag14kg / 30.86lbs
Weight845g / 29.81oz
Line retireve per crank116 centimeter / 45.67 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €289.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.7/429

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX edges out Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (175g / 6,17oz) and the line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). Still, Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
