Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
