Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (6.62 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X
