Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.6 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin YUPIE


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
