Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.56 out of 10) and total score (8.77 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
