Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.7:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
