Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX clearly outshines Daiwa TD Match 4012X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Daiwa TD Match 4012X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa TD Match?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa TD Match 4012X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
