Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.2/220. 0.25/140, 0.3/100

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 3000 SRC, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano Catana 3000 SRC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana 3000 SRC and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Mitchell 308 2000X
