Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.56 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
