Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX and Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.6:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano 19 Stella?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
