Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX and Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
