Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.6 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X
Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX