Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
