Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
