Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Spinning
37.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 SS DH HG
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and weight (265g / 9,35oz). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
