Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
