Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX edges out Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 4.7:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
