Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
