Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/240

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X
