Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
