Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
