Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
