Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X
