Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
92.50 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
