Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Delphin CarbonIX?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
