Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a ball bearings of 5+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
