Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanford FA, C2000HGA, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VFC2000HGA
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €184.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000HGA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/195
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD, 4012, left and right hand, Match and Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10215-412
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €199.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX offers a weight of 155g / 5,47oz, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables