Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Shimano Vanford FA, C2000HGA, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VFC2000HGA
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €184.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000HGA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/195
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750, QR 750, Spinning Angelrolle, Frontbremse, 10431-075
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €32.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeQR 750
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Conclusion

Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and total score (8.2 out of 10). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?

Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX

  • 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques