Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
