Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Feeder And Match
52.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX clearly outshines Daiwa Nzon Distance 25, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (180g / 6,35oz). While Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa Nzon Distance 25?
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
