Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
