Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
