Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 4000X and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano Catana FE 4000X offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
